FOIA – Internal Review – IR2010026

This entry was posted by on Monday, 6 September, 2010 at
Received the attached from the BBC foi team today(they left it right to the limit and required a reminder, maybe they thought I’d forget ;) )
It is interesting that the emails are originally talking about how the BBC could help out the developer “chuck him some cash” but that the eventual step was to force beebplayer to be shut down. 
I think that there is very little chance of getting the information about how the decision to shut down beebplayer was made but I still think the beeb have screwed up. Why not make the streams available and let the community build apps for different platforms? 

Begin forwarded message:

From: “FOI Enquiries” <foi@bbc.co.uk>
Date: 6 September 2010 16:10:31 GMT+01:00
Subject: FOIA – Internal Review – IR2010026

Please find attached the response to your internal review request considered under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act. 

Information Policy and Compliance Team 

BBC Freedom of Information
Room 2252
BBC White City
201 Wood Lane
London W12 7TS, UK

Website: www.bbc.co.uk/foi/
Email: mailto:foi@bbc.co.uk
Tel: 020 8008 2883
Fax: 020 8008 2398

http://www.bbc.co.uk
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to this.

IR2010026 – dislcoure emails.pdf
Download this file

Internal Review Decision Note – 2010-09-02.pdf
Download this file

IR2010026 – disclosure – RFI20100948 – final response.pdf
Download this file

3 Responses to “FOIA – Internal Review – IR2010026”

  1. Tom Adams

    The redacted name in the third document is mine: http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/beebplayerI'm glad you managed to get some emails out of them.

  2. Szlwzl

    Great stuff, nice to meet you!! It was a struggle to get the information and I still think they can release more. Why cut off users such as ourselves that have paid our license fee? Why operate a single platform  client while limiting access from others(favouring Apple for instance)? Why force users to use a proprietory piece of software like flash.

  3. shen_ye

    Why force people to use flash when it’s the least stable plugin for a browser on a pc, let alone on a phone.