Translink & Open Data #opengov

In mid-September I went to a great conference organised by Brian Cleland. The amount of gov.uk organisations was reasonably heartening although their message was less so. Essentially it boiled down to "don't call us, we'll call you". GIS data being released in 2019 for instance and everything waiting on the publication of a report from Whitehall.

One of the local organisations which I, and I believe many others, feel is really dragging in terms of open data is Translink who operate the trains/buses etc here in Northern Ireland on behalf of the Northern Ireland Transport Holding Company which is a Public Corporation(essentially, I believe, a company owned by our government). There have been efforts in the past by some brave local individuals to access the data from Translink but with very little success, I believe some PDFs were acquired at one point but nothing which was easily machine readable. I wrote to Translink on the day of the event and received the following in response:

Thank you for your email of 22 September 2011 to our Feedback facility. Prompted by your e-mail I checked across our organisation and have not been able to confirm that any of the Translink team received an invitation to the event to which you refer.

That said, it would be wrong to conclude that Translink is not actively involved in the task of making its data more available to the public. The following lists some of the areas where Translink is making a valuable contribution in this sphere:

  1. We are working with the EU Inspire team to ensure Translink is fully compliant in the area of data share
  2. We have an ongoing programme in place to update our data across Metro, Goldline, Ulsterbus and NIR services  
  3. We are working with our sponsor department (DRD) and with representatives from DETI to explore ways in which we can make our data available to mobile apps developers I trust this brief response serves to assure you that Translink is playing an active role in this area.

The note I received highlights what I believe are some of the problems with Translink's view on open data:

  1. Fully Compliant - why be fully compliant when you can exceed the standards required easily. Open the data up and you will be fully compliant.
  2. Programme in place to update the data - the data is there, open it up and the community will probably help you to keep it up to date. 
  3. Exploring ways to make the data available - It seems they have been exploring for a while. Why not check out this and more specifically this from the MTA in NYC? Free data available for developers to use.

It's about time that the data was opened so that something can be done with it - there are some great apps out there already which have been pulled together from a screenscraping session but there should be more.

Why not tweet @translink_ni or write to them and ask them to open up the data?

 

Update 24th Oct 21:56: I have just done an FOI request  to ask for a bit more information from NITHC.

Filed under  //  opendata    opengov   translink  
Posted

Dexter spoiler alert(but a fricking great image)

Fonbt

Update 09/02/11 - 16:00

Thanks to @moonpo we now know it was created by Shahed Syed - brilliant work Shahed! Article on it is here

I'm not sure who created this image so can't credit them - whoever it
was - great work!

Posted

Dublin Marathon pictures are now online

Screenshot-17

Dublin Marathon pictures are now available - thought I'd screengrab the one which shows we actually completed it(in case this was in doubt!!)


Posted

The Dublin Marathon route and times

I use Google's myTracks a lot and found it really useful today while running the Dublin Marathon to keep track of times and distances. It seems to be slightly inaccurate today as it is saying that we actually did 26.9 miles but gives a good idea of what we did. You can click through to see the larger map and even times(the geek in me fricking loves this). 

We raised a great amount of cash for the MS Society - totals are on here and here - thanks to all of our sponsors!!


View Dublin Marathon in a larger map

Filed under  //  dublin marathon   marathon  
Posted

Paranormal Activity 2

I know a lot of people thought it was shit but I was terrified by Paranormal Activity last year - they've made another one and it doesn't look dreadful.

Posted

The Greggs croissant story

I made a quick comment to the BBC about this story highlighting the fact that it appeared to be just a press release and got a great reply back from the business editor. The link shows how the story was changed very quickly after publication.
On another note, newssniffer.co.uk looks like a very useful site.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: NewsOnline Comments <newsonline.suggestions@bbc.co.uk>
Date: 7 October 2010 17:20
Subject: FW: Feedback [NewsWatch]
To: <removed>

Dear Mr Whittaker

Many thanks for your e-mail.

I can only concur - when I spotted the story on Wednesday morning on the
website, I had it changed immediately.

The story now focuses on the company's results.

I believe it is ok to mention that Gregg's is now selling croissants and
similar fare, not least as this is not the kind of food that one would
associate with this store chain.

But the original headline and lead of the story was clearly not in
order.

I have had words with both the author and the sub editor who published
the story.

Regards

Tim Weber
Business editor
BBC News - interactive + radio   http://bbc.co.uk/business
<direct phone etc removed>

-----Original Message-----
From: <removed
Sent: 06 October 2010 09:45
To: NewsOnline Comments
Subject: Feedback [NewsWatch]


From:           Simon whittaker
Email address:  <removed>
Country:        UK

COMMENTS: This is not a news story, it is a regurgitated press release.
Absolutely ridiculous...
Simon whittaker, UK

URL:    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-11482293

Posted

FOIA - Internal Review - IR2010026

Received the attached from the BBC foi team today(they left it right to the limit and required a reminder, maybe they thought I'd forget ;))
It is interesting that the emails are originally talking about how the BBC could help out the developer "chuck him some cash" but that the eventual step was to force beebplayer to be shut down. 
I think that there is very little chance of getting the information about how the decision to shut down beebplayer was made but I still think the beeb have screwed up. Why not make the streams available and let the community build apps for different platforms? 

Begin forwarded message:

From: "FOI Enquiries" <foi@bbc.co.uk>
Date: 6 September 2010 16:10:31 GMT+01:00
Subject: FOIA - Internal Review - IR2010026

Please find attached the response to your internal review request considered under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act. 

Information Policy and Compliance Team 

BBC Freedom of Information
Room 2252
BBC White City
201 Wood Lane
London W12 7TS, UK

Website: www.bbc.co.uk/foi/
Email: mailto:foi@bbc.co.uk
Tel: 020 8008 2883
Fax: 020 8008 2398


http://www.bbc.co.uk
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to this.

Click here to download:
IR2010026 - dislcoure emails.pdf (80 KB)
(download)

Click here to download:
Internal Review Decision Note - 2010-09-02.pdf (63 KB)
(download)

(download)

Filed under  //  beebplayer   foi  
Posted

Beebplayer FOI request

Click here to download:
RFI20200835 - final response.pdf (95 KB)
(download)

I was intrigued to see that the beebplayer application had been removed from the android marketplace and submitted an FOI request to discover more. The response back from them was not especially helpful and I have responded asking for further information. I find it very annoying that the beebplayer app was removed - it is the one I use the most on my HTC hero. I will probably not be able to upgrade my phone to 2.2  and therefore will not be able to use the services I have paid for in the license fee :( There is an interesting thread here about the removal of the beebplayer from the marketplace.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: FOI Enquiries <foi@bbc.co.uk>
Date: 13 July 2010 17:33
Subject: RFI20100835 - request for information
To:


Dear Mr Whittaker,

Please find attached the response to your request for information, reference RFI20100835.

<<RFI20200835 - final response.pdf>>

Kind regards

Louise Wright
Information Policy and Compliance    

BBC Freedom of Information
Room 2252, White City
201 Wood Lane
London W12 7TS, UK

Website: www.bbc.co.uk/foi
Email: foi@bbc.co.uk
Tel: 020 8008 2883
Fax: 020 8008 2398

 
http://www.bbc.co.uk
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to this.

Filed under  //  beebplayer   foi  
Posted

Running Dublin - we want your money!!!

On October 25th the wife I will be running the Dublin marathon and are going to try and raise a bunch of money for the MS Society. We'd really appreciate your assistance with raising as much money as possible and have set ourselves a target of trying to raise £1000 each. If anyone would like to join us on the run that would be brilliant but if not then if you could spare a few gbp/ausd/usd or any other currency you have then the link is http://bit.ly/simonrunsdublin. THANK YOU!!!!

Posted

#debill FOI request email #18907

Have edited my FOI request to BIS re #debill to try and get the
information I am interested in.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Simon Whittaker
Date: 17 June 2010 21:31
Subject: Re: Freedom of Information Request 10/0699 - Internal Review
To: "REMOVED"


HI David,

Many thanks for your respose, what I am interested in discovering is
the process by which the Digital economy Bill was modified to include
items such as net disconnection and the incredible powers which Lord
Mandleson wanted to be granted to Secretary of State and which were
quite sensibly refused by the due process, I am also interested to
discover if it was planned to always implement this as a washup bill.
Therefore, I would like to rephrase my request as:

Please can you provide all communication(such as memoranda, email &
minutes of meetings) relating to the proposed digital economy bill
from August 2009, September 2009, October 2009, & November 2009 which
included Sion Simon, Lord Mandleson or Stephen Timms as participants
or recipients.

Many thanks

Simon

On 16 June 2010 09:59, REMOVED wrote:
> Simon
>
> I am unclear whether I replied to this.  I believe I started to do so, but can't see an email in my sent box, so may not have finished it.
>
> Laura Williams has moved on to a new job now and so she wouldn't be handling any further FOI requests about the Digital Economy Act.  If you send any adjusted request to me then I will pass it on to an action official.
>
> To be frank though, I really doubt that there is any information of the sort you are seeking to find at BIS or DCMS - for example we don't hold any information at all about what Lord Mandelson may or may not have done other than as Ministerial business, for instance in his private capacity.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> REMOVED
>

Filed under  //  #debill   deact   digital economy bill  
Posted